Ponderingtheessence.com is hosted by Hostmonster.com

What is piglot? click here to find out.

27 September 2011
Michael Jackson’s personal physician, Conrad Murray, has gone on trial in Los Angeles, charged with involuntary manslaughter of the singer.
Prosecutors say he acted with “gross negligence” and gave Jackson a lethal dose of the sedative propofol, on the night he died in June 2009.
The defence says Jackson gave himself too much of the drug, a sleeping aid.
If convicted, Dr Murray, 58, could face four years in jail and the loss of his medical licence.
Slurred recording
In Tuesday’s opening statement, lead prosecutor David Walgren told the court the evidence would show “Conrad Murray repeatedly acted with gross negligence, repeatedly denied appropriate care to his patient, Michael Jackson”.
Lead prosecutor, David Walgren, plays an audio recording said to be from Dr Conrad Murray’s mobile phone
“That misplaced trust… cost Michael Jackson his life.”
The court heard a recording of Jackson slurring while talking about planned comeback concerts.
Mr Walgren said the audio, aired in public for the first time, had come from Dr Murray’s mobile phone.
“When people leave my show, I want them to say, ‘I’ve never seen nothing like this in my life’,” says the voice on the audio.
The prosecutor said Jackson’s difficulty in speaking on the recording showed that Dr Murray ought to have realised the star should not have taken any more propofol.
Mr Walgren said that after administering a dose of the drug on the date of Jackson’s death, Dr Murray had not been attentive to the star’s health.
‘Abandoned’
The prosecutor said the doctor had left to go to the bathroom and checked his mobile phone.
Chief prosecutor David Walgren: Michael Jackson trusted his life to the medical skills of Conrad Murray
“He [Murray] left him [Jackson] there, abandoned him to fend for himself,” the prosecutor said.
Mr Walgren said when Dr Murray found Jackson unconscious, he did not immediately call the emergency services, instead telling a bodyguard to do so 20 minutes later.
Dr Murray also did not mention to paramedics or emergency room doctors that he had administered propofol, according to the prosecutor.
The jury was also shown a photo of Jackson’s pale body lying on a gurney after he died.
Hundreds of Jackson fans gathered outside court as the trial began with opening statements from defence and prosecution. The proceedings are being televised and broadcast online.
Jackson choreographer Kenny Ortega was set to be the first prosecution witnesses to take the stand.
Mr Ortega was expected to lead the court through some footage from Jackson’s final rehearsals as the 50-year-old star prepared for his series of comeback concerts.
That video eventually became part of a documentary, This Is It, directed by Mr Ortega.
A judge has blocked some details of Jackson and Dr Murray’s lives being discussed at the trial.
Extra dose?
Jackson’s history with drugs and financial troubles, as well as Dr Murray’s debts and personal affairs, will not come out in court.
Both sides were expected to focus on Jackson’s last hours.
Multiple witnesses, including security guards, paramedics and emergency room doctors are to be called.
The prosecution also plans to play a recording of Dr Murray’s police interview two days after Jackson’s death, in which the doctor says he gave the singer propofol for his insomnia.
The disclosure led to charges being brought against Dr Murray in February 2010.
Propofol is usually administered intravenously, often during surgery.
Medical experts are expected to testify about the sedative’s effects, as well as how a trace amount of the drug was found in Jackson’s stomach.
Defence lawyers are putting forward the theory that Jackson drank or somehow administered an extra dose of propofol after Dr Murray left.
The trial is expected to last about five weeks.
The jury comprises seven men and five women, one African American, six whites and five Latinos.
For those of you who did not see the exchange between Sen. Barbara Boxer and
a General in a Senate hearing, it was one of the most crass and rude
exchanges I’ve ever seen. She asked him a question and he answered with the
term ‘Ma’am’. She told him she was a Senator and to not call her ma’am. Thus
the following letter. Brilliant in it’s substance, so deserving in its
accuracy.
From a Guard Aviator and Captain for Alaska Air Lines. He hits the nail
directly on the head…. Enjoy.
Barbara Boxer; Stand at Attention in Front of Our Armed Forces
You were so right on when you scolded the General on TV for using the term,
“ma’am,” instead of “Senator.” After all, in the military, “ma’am” is a term
of respect when addressing a female of superior rank or position.
The General was totally wrong. You are not a person of superior rank or
position. You are a member of one of the world’s most corrupt organizations,
the U. S. Senate, equaled only by the U. S. House of Representatives.
Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks
(one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals, and other low
level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to
enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the people of
the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually
re-elected. Many democrats even want American troops killed by releasing
photographs.
How many of you could honestly say, “We pledge our lives, our fortunes and
our sacred honor”? None? One? Two?
Your reaction to the general shows several things. First is your abysmal
ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the general shows you to
be an elitist of the worst kind. When the general entered the military (as
most of us who served) he wrote the government a blank check, offering his
life to protect your derriere now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20
thousand dollar leather chair, paid for by the general’s taxes. You repaid
him for this by humiliating him in front of millions.
Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and arrogance,
which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish behavior shows you
to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or shrew, unfit for your
position, regardless of the support of the unwashed, uneducated masses who
have made California into the laughing stock of the nation.
What I am writing, Senator, are the same thoughts countless millions of
Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability or time to
convey them. Under the democrats, some don’t even have the 44 cents to buy
the stamp. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize politicians are pretty
much the same, and will vote for the one who will bring home the most bacon,
even if they do consider how corrupt that person is.
Lord Acton (1834 1902) so aptly charged, “Power tends to corrupt and
absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues,
Mr. Power has had his way with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.
Finally Senator; I too, have a title. It is “Right Wing Extremist Potential
Terrorist Threat.” It is not of my choosing, but was given to me by your
Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano… And “ma’am” offended
you?
Cheers!
Jim Hill
16808 – 103rd Avenue Court
East South Hill, WA 98375